![]() Bundles are inherently spatial in two key ways. I wrote that social practices, that is, practice-arrangement bundles, make and have spaces. To say that practices and arrangements bundle is to say (1) that practices effect, use, give meaning to, and are inseparable from arrangements while (2) arrangements channel, prefigure, facilitate, and are essential to practices. By a material arrangement, incidentally, I mean linked people, organisms, artifacts, and things. The conviction that some amalgam of activity and materiality is ontologically and dynamically fundamental to social analysis is shared by a range of contemporary theoretical approaches including actor network theory, sociocultural theories of mediated action, object-centered socialities, and some accounts of science. Because the relationship between practices and material arrangements is so intimate, it is the notion of a bundle of practices and arrangements, and not just that of a practice simplicitor, that is fundamental to analyzing social phenomena. Most practices, finally, would not exist without materialities of the sorts dealt with in them, just as most material arrangements today dealt with in practices would not exist in the absence of these practices. In just about every practice, moreover, people deal with material entities. Doings and sayings, for example, are carried out by embodied human beings. These organized activities are inevitably, and often inextricably, bound up with material entities. The present essay focuses on my own interpretation of this claim.Īs I construe them (see Schatzki 1996, 2002), practices are nexuses of human activity, open-ended sets of doings and sayings organized by understandings, rules, and teleoaffectivities. Their theories uphold the thesis proffered in the previous paragraph, that social practices make and have spaces. Bourdieu, Giddens, Shove, Reckwitz, Kemmis, Gherardi). Others have elaborated conceptions of social practices and explicitly theorized social life through them (e.g. It is often used almost unreflectively, in a manner suggesting that the person using it construes his or her subject matter either as rooted in or as a form of human activity. The term “practices” is pervasive in social theory today. The social practices that make spaces themselves are and have spaces. Moreover, the spaces pertinent to social life are ever increasingly the product of practices. ![]() Practices are inherently spatial phenomena. This opening section also summarizes ideas developed elsewhere (Schatzki 2002, 2010). I do this because my ideas on this topic inform my account of the spatial dimensions of large phenomena. I begin with a few words about the spaces of social practices. This essay offers a practice theoretical analysis of three prominent spatial dimensions of large social phenomena : the objective spaces they encompass, the interwoven timespaces they exhibit, and the applicability to them of the notion of levels.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |